Transurethral resection of the prostate in 85+ patients: a retrospective, multicentre study.

PURPOSE: To determine the safety and efficacy of transurethral resection of the prostate (TUR-P) in patients 85 years or older. METHODS: In this retrospective, multicentre study, patients equal or older than 85 years at the time of surgery (2015-2020) were included. Several pre-, peri- and postoperative parameters were collected. The main outcome criterion was spontaneous voiding with a post-void residual (PVR) volume < 100 ml at dismission and at 12 months after surgery. RESULTS: One hundred sixty-eight patients (median age: 87 years, interquartile range [IQR]: 86-89) were recruited. The patients took on average 5.2 permanent medications (3-8), 107 (64%) were anticoagulated preoperatively and neurological co-morbidities were present in 29 (17%). The indication for surgery was recurrent urinary retention in 66.3% (n = 110) with a mean retention volume of 849 ml. The mean PVR volume of the remaining 35% was 146 ml. Surgery was successfully completed in all patients. A perioperative surgical revision had to be performed in 3% and 13 patients (7.7%) required blood transfusion. After catheter removal, 85% of patients were able to void spontaneously with a PVR < 100 ml, and 14.3% were dismissed with a catheter. Twelve months data were available for 93 patients (55%). Of this cohort, 78 (83.9%) were able to void spontaneously with a PVR < 100 ml, 12 (12.9%) were on permanent catheterization. One patient (0.6%) died perioperatively. The only significant factor associated with an unsuccessful outcome was the number of permanent medications (6.8 vs. 5.0, p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: This retrospective multicentre study documents the safety and efficacy of TURP (monopolar and bipolar) in the old-old cohort.

Testicular Tumor Markers in the Spermatic Vein - Correlation to Pathology, Stage and Outcome.

OBJECTIVE: To report our findings in patients with determination of testicular tumor markers from the vena spermatica during inguinal orchiectomy. METHODS: In a retrospective setting, data of patients who underwent inguinal orchiectomy between January 2004 and December 2014 were analyzed. Cubital and testicular vein tumor markers were assessed and correlated to histology, clinical stage and outcome. RESULTS: A total of 90 patients (seminomatous: n = 53, non-seminomatous: n = 37) with a median age of 37 years were included. The mean follow-up was 109 months. Overall, 60% (n = 54) of patients had one or more positive tumor marker level in the cubital vein vs 88.9% (n = 80) in the testicular vein. Median tumor marker levels of hCGß in cubital and testicular vein were 1.9 U/l and 30.8U/l; the respective values for AFP were 2.9ng/ml and 2.4ng/ml and for hPLAP 49.9 mU/l and 418.9 mU/l. Differences in cubital vs testicular vein positivity were stage dependant and highest for pT1. Patients with seminomatous tumors had peripheral positivity of 59.3% vs 88.9% in the testicular vein (P = 0.003); in non-seminomatous patients the respective values were 61.1% and 88.9% (P = 0.02). All recurrent cancer patients under active surveillance (n = 5) were positive in the testicular vein. CONCLUSION: Virtually all testicular cancers shed tumor markers in the circulation. Differences in marker positivity (testicular vs testicular vein) were stage dependent (greatest in pT1), largely independent of histology and highest for hCGß. The prognostic value of testicular vein sampling remains speculative.